exactly, the social sphere is just a part of our biology, if you want to use biology as a term. reality isn't really divided into "parts" the way we humans see it. society is as much a part of biology as our brains are.
apparently it's technically possible to synthesise a benzo that isn't addictive. i wonder why they haven't done it yet. perhaps because benzos are amazing and there is no chance in hell that big pharma wants us to be happy.
Was that based on that one paper posted by a user here? I don't think it showed it was definitely, only a potential
way. One study though, and speculative. Pretty much anything that touched GABA receptors wasn't supposed to be addictive when it started out, but turned out to be.
A non addictive benzo would definitely be something pharmaceutical companies would want to sell, it would be like the 50's all over again when everyone took benzos. Non addictive benzodiazepene, and non addictive opiod and you have anxiety and depression pretty much dealt with, and pharmaceutical companies would be making tonnes of money. Honestly though, the problem with anything that takes away distress rapidly, even if it works on receptors that "don't give euphoria" or whatever, are probably going to be addictive for those who get relief from them. I sure as **** would struggle with something like that.
Atm I wake every morning with emotional pain that feels pretty close to physical pain. Kratom removed it, the distress, the grief, and gave me a balanced outlook. I had to throw it all
away, because I knew what was coming. No dodging addiction if you cave in to something that works rapidly, like that.
I would like to be wrong though, just history has shown that anything GABA and fast acting = addictive.