Robert Mueller’s Team Says Report Had More Troubling Details About Trump Than William Barr Revealed
Some Special Counsel investigators have expressed displeasure at the way the attorney general has portrayed their findings, reports say.
By Dominique Mosbergen
Investigators on Robert Mueller
’s team are vexed at Attorney General William Barr
’s characterization of the special counsel’s report. They say Barr “failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry,” The New York Times reported
Hours later, The Washington Post corroborated this account
, reporting that some members of Mueller’s team had expressed frustration at the attorney general’s March 24 summary to Congress
in which he absolved President Donald Trump
of any obstruction of justice.
A number of special counsel investigators told associates that the evidence they gathered on the question of obstruction
was both “alarming and significant,” the Post reported. The paper also quoted a person familiar with the probe as saying the evidence was “much more acute than Barr suggested.”
Further details were not provided.
ASSOCIATED PRESS Investigators on Robert Mueller
’s team were reportedly frustrated by the summary Attorney General William Barr issued to Congress
on March 24.
Some investigators were particularly miffed that Barr had not released the official summaries of the report that their team had prepared, the Post reported. One official told the paper that the special counsel report was written in such a way that would have allowed “the front matter from each section ... [to be] released immediately — or very quickly” to the public.
“It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself,” the official said.
However, two unnamed government officials told the Times that the Justice Department had determined that these summaries contained sensitive information, including classified material.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), speaking to MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell on Wednesday night, questioned
why Barr had felt “the need to release his own summary” instead of releasing the summaries produced by Mueller’s team.
“Why didn’t he release a summary produced by Bob Mueller himself instead of trying to shape it through his own words?” Schiff, who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, said.
Trump said Mueller’s report should be released. House voted 420-0 to release it. But now Trump and his congressional allies are changing their tune.
They don’t want the public to see the full report, only parts of it.
That’s not going to fly. Barr must release the full report. https://t.co/xZwoq9AyY0
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) April 3, 2019
On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee voted to authorize a subpoena for the full Mueller report
. “The committee must see everything,” said committee chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.).
Nadler also said that he’d give Barr some time to “change his mind” about providing an unredacted version of the report to Congress before issuing a subpoena.
Reacting to the reports of displeasure among some people in Mueller’s office, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani blasted the special counsel’s team, calling it a group of “Angry Democrats”:
The NYT story about unspecified troubling findings in report is as accurate as the NYT saying Mueller’s staff didn’t leak. Who leaked this...Mueller’s unethical staff. This proves they are Angry Democrats who couldn’t find or create evidence to support collusion or obstruction
— Rudy Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) April 4, 2019
As the Times noted, Mueller’s team included 19 lawyers and about 40 FBI agents and other staff members. It’s unclear, the paper said, “how widespread the vexation” was among them.