Federal Lab Forced To Close After ‘Disturbing’ Data Manipulation - Social Anxiety Forum
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-25-2016, 03:23 PM Thread Starter
SASsy
 
Cletis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Western USA
Language: King's English
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,770
My Mood: Brooding
Exclamation

Federal Lab Forced To Close After ‘Disturbing’ Data Manipulation


Federal Lab Forced To Close After ‘Disturbing’ Data Manipulation


Nearly two decades and $108 million worth of “disturbing” data manipulation with “serious and far ranging” effects forced a federal lab to close, a congressman revealed Thursday.

The inorganic section of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Energy Geochemistry Laboratory in Lakewood, Colo. manipulated data on a variety of topics – including many related to the environment – from 1996 to 2014. The manipulation was caught in 2008, but continued another six years.

“It’s astounding that we spend $108 million on manipulated research and then the far-reaching effects that that would have,” Rep. Bruce Westerman said at a House Natural Resources subcommittee hearing. “We know how research multiples and affects different parts of our society and our economy and … if you’re working off of flawed data it definitely could be in a bad way.”

“The problems were so severe, in fact, that the USGS has already closed the inorganic lab in question permanently,” the Arkansas Republican said. The lab was terminated in January.

Westerman cited a recent Department of the Interior Inspector General (IG) report that said impacts from the data manipulation “are not yet known but, nevertheless, they will be serious and far ranging. The affected projects represented about $108 million in taxpayer funding from fiscal year 2008 through 2014.”

Westerman also highlighted an interview the IG withheld from its report.

“Tell me what you want and I will get it for you. What we do is like magic,” a former USGS official told auditors a former employee linked to the manipulation would say, according to Westerman.

Westerman added that the IG’s interview notes make the context of those quotes unclear.

“Given the lab’s history and that problems had already been identified when this interview was being conducted, such a statement seems potentially significant,” Westerman told Deputy IG Mary Kendall, a witness for the hearing.

“Your office explained that you do not know the context or veracity of this statement and that this issue was not part of the audit,” Westerman told Kendall. (RELATE: Interior Watchdog ‘Politicized’ Investigations, Enviro Nonprofit Claims)

Regardless, other scientists became aware and requested that lab work be taken elsewhere.

“USGS has advised committee staff that because scientists had already begun to distrust this lab so significantly that they began relying upon analysis from other labs,” Westerman said.

It’s unclear what effects the manipulated data will have, though Westerman – who touted his engineering background – noted the importance of research integrity.

“I’m not even sure what the scientific result were used in,” he said. “A lot of the work that people do that’s based on scientific research is so important and if the base research is flawed, then that affects the work that goes out from there.”

The research topics that faced data manipulation – including uranium in the environment, health effects of energy resources, and U.S. coal resources and reserves – was “disturbing,” Westerman said.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/23/fe...#ixzz4Cd10SFzR
Cletis is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-25-2016, 04:01 PM
SAS Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NYC
Gender: Genderqueer
Posts: 6,192
My Mood: Twisted
$108 million in taxpayer..... *effin rage*
M0rbid is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-25-2016, 04:28 PM
SAS Member
 
novalax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Virginia
Gender: Male
Age: 22
Posts: 2,456
I almost wish I could return to a time when I was coddled by my statist ignorance. I suppose the rage and utter contempt I have for the government is the price I pay for being right.
novalax is offline  
 
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-25-2016, 05:19 PM
SAS Member
 
millenniumman75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dayton, OH
Gender: Male
Age: 44
Posts: 152,763
My Mood: Angelic
Welcome back, @novalax

It's the Obomination.

millenniumman75
You are a success story waiting to happen!
Live and let live VACUUMS more than a Hoover....
Live and HELP live is better!

TROLL ALERT STATUS:
CHAT -> BERT

FORUMS -> ERNIE
(troll activity on the increase)

WATCH WHAT YOU TYPE!
millenniumman75 is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-25-2016, 05:39 PM
SAS's Chief Meteorologist
 
Maslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denver
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,542
It's all Obama's fault! (Even though it has been going on since 1996 and the latest issue began when Bush was still president.)

The data manipulation was done by one chemist who was probably a conservative.
Maslow is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-25-2016, 05:53 PM
SAS Member
 
novalax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Virginia
Gender: Male
Age: 22
Posts: 2,456
Thanks, its good to be back @millenniumman75
novalax is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-25-2016, 07:18 PM
On An Indefinite Hiatus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maslow View Post
one chemist who was probably a conservative.
How do you know that he or she was a conservative?

Got any evidence for that or are you just assuming?

I am just curious on how you came to that conclusion.

...
iAmCodeMonkey is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 06-26-2016, 06:30 AM
SAS Member
 
Classified's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio, USA
Gender: Male
Age: 39
Posts: 8,134
Because it had to deal with coal and uranium mining. Do you know what the USGS does?

Quote:
The research topics that faced data manipulation – including uranium, health effects of energy resources, and U.S. coal resources and reserves – was “disturbing,” Westerman said.
This isn't the right wing fantasy of finding out greenhouse gasses aren't polluting the atmosphere. Even though the spin that the article has made it seem like if you can't trust this data, why trust any data...
Classified is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome