|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: alabama
Gender: Female
Posts: 360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Status: gone
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,579
|
For this kind of question you'd have to take the derivative and solve for zero, since the function would be a parabola opening upward. Setting the derivative equal to zero and solving for x shows you where the slope of the parabola would be zero, which would be at its minimum point. Having got that value for x (the production level where cost is minimized) you'd plug that number back into the original function to get the cost.
Does that make sense? Do you have the function written down right? Should something be a minus rather than a plus? Because the way it's written there, C(x) would just increase as x increases, as long as x is positive. If that's correct, then C(x) will never be less than 4000, which occurs when x=0.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|