baseball 2008 - Social Anxiety Forum
X

Download the SAS Android App

Or switch to mobile version of the forums

X

Download the SAS iPhone App

Or switch to mobile version of the forums

Help/FAQLog InJoin SAS
Go Back   Social Anxiety Forum > Discussion > Sports Beat

Reply
Old 02-14-2008, 07:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 9,960



Default baseball 2008

lets get the discussion going..

it is way too early for me to predict a world series champion.

the red sox basically return everyone.

the tigers are going to be fantastic. they made some great off season moves. and i still think curtis granderson is one of the most underrated players in the game.

things are a little more muddled in the nl. i hope my cubs can make some noise. arizona and san diego will have very tough teams...as will the rockies.
__________________
"charge the enemy! and remember you are from old virginia." george pickett. july 3, 1863.
odun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 02:14 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BC
Age: 29
Posts: 2,051



Default Re: baseball 2008

I hope the Jays are still shopping Rios around for another arm. I think a lot of the Jays success will depend on how Rolen does.

That, and who doesn't want to see the old retro baby blues!!!
PGVan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 10:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 42
Posts: 4,842



Default Re: baseball 2008

The Indians retrun everyone as well. The Tigers did improve, but pitching is still a big question mark for them.

Brian
brimontz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008, 06:32 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Tungsten's Avatar
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Gender: Male
Age: 33
Posts: 1,152



Default Re: baseball 2008

It would be a good story if the Cubs could win the World Series, being the 100th anniversary of the 1908 team, although I like the Mets chances with Santana. NL West should be a good 4 team race.
The AL looks like 4 teams for 3 spots again, with the Angeles printing playoff tickets by July. I know Seattle added Bedard, but their offense doesn't look very strong and I think they're going to regret trading Adam Jones. Bos/NYY & Cle/Det, flip a coin. Look out for Tampa Bay, I think this may be the year they finally reach .500.
Tungsten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 10:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 27/M/Boston
Posts: 102



Default Re: baseball 2008

well I know my Red Sox are going to the playoffs and I see a high possibility of a world series ring again. But yeah sooner or later the cubs really need to win a world series, I mean I feel bad for them since I suffered for sooo long as an avid red sox fans.
__________________
Quote: The mind that is anxious about the future is miserable.

Quote: There are more things to alarm us than to harm us, and we suffer more often in apprehension than reality.

Author: Seneca 4 B.C. – 65 A.D., Spanish-born Roman Statesman, philosopher
beanman80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 08:37 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Status: gone
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,599



Default Re: baseball 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by PGVan
I hope the Jays are still shopping Rios around for another arm. I think a lot of the Jays success will depend on how Rolen does.
I think this team will pitch extremely well. So far that's been borne out in the first eleven games. How the Jays ultimately do depends entirely on how well they hit, I think.

Quote:
That, and who doesn't want to see the old retro baby blues!!!
__________________

Zephyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 11:10 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 42
Posts: 4,842



Default Re: baseball 2008

The Tigers certainly aren't living up to their payroll thus far. Cleveland's not doing much better at 5-7, but at least they aren't paying as much as Detroit is for a 2-9 record that is deceiving -- they could just as easily be 0-11.

Brian
brimontz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 11:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
sully20's Avatar
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: IL
Gender: Female
Posts: 116



Default Re: baseball 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by brimontz
The Tigers certainly aren't living up to their payroll thus far. Cleveland's not doing much better at 5-7, but at least they aren't paying as much as Detroit is for a 2-9 record that is deceiving -- they could just as easily be 0-11.
It's a nice change to see the Royals and White Sox on top of the divison so far this season.
__________________

sully20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 06:41 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 42
Posts: 4,842



Default Re: baseball 2008

Well, I'm not a fan of Chicago -- it wasn't that long ago that they won it all, but I've been a fan of KC since the 70s when Brett was at his peak. Chicago is too big of a market for me to root for in this sport where the top markets can still outspend everyone else.

Brian
brimontz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 08:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 9,960



Default Re: baseball 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by brimontz
Well, I'm not a fan of Chicago -- it wasn't that long ago that they won it all, but I've been a fan of KC since the 70s when Brett was at his peak. Chicago is too big of a market for me to root for in this sport where the top markets can still outspend everyone else.

Brian
i am a fan of chicago...the cubs.

i do like the royals, as i like most small market teams. i remember brett. i even remember the pine tar incident and the sitting out of a game due to hemmorhoids!
__________________
"charge the enemy! and remember you are from old virginia." george pickett. july 3, 1863.
odun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 10:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,987



Default Re: baseball 2008

I have no favorite this season yet.

And of course, San Francisco is not doing well.

Ok. You can throw your Barry Zito jokes now.
Gerard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 11:10 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
WineKitty's Avatar
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Age: 44
Posts: 12,814



Default Re: baseball 2008

GO TIGERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
"You can never really know a person and if you think you can, you're living in a ****ing dream world!" David Fisher, Six Feet Under
WineKitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 12:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tampa, Fla.
Age: 53
Posts: 915



Default Re: baseball 2008

The Braves are my team. Escobar has played great. Chipper, well, what else can you say? AWESOME! Everybody has played pretty well, and the pitching has been solid. The bullpen has pulled its weight. Kotsay was a great addition. I never liked Andruw "Mr. Strikeout" Jones, and was praying the Bravos wouldn't resign him. He is stubborn, and always tries to pull everything. The competition between the Marlins, Phillies, Mets and us will be fun all season. GO BRAVOS!
BeachGaBulldog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 03:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 444



Default Re: baseball 2008

im a met fan, i don't think they will do much this year. we dont even have a minor league to look forward to.
__________________
"The man who goes alone can start today; but he who travels with another must wait till that other is ready." - Henry David Thoreau
conscious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 05:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
 
Tungsten's Avatar
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Gender: Male
Age: 33
Posts: 1,152



Default Re: baseball 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by conscious
im a met fan, i don't think they will do much this year. we dont even have a minor league to look forward to.
It's still early. I think they'll get into a hot streak at some point but it sounds like Willie could be in trouble if they don't turn it around soon.
Tungsten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 09:51 AM   #16 (permalink)
 
Status: gone
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,599



Default Re: baseball 2008

Figure I'd revive this thread now that it's August...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGVan
I hope the Jays are still shopping Rios around for another arm. I think a lot of the Jays success will depend on how Rolen does.
I think this team will pitch extremely well. So far that's been borne out in the first eleven games. How the Jays ultimately do depends entirely on how well they hit, I think.
Jeez I hate being right. One of these decades the Jays will get their hitting and pitching together. It's got to happen by chance sometime, right? This staff was good enough.

Well, what else is going on? Tampa's still leading the AL East. Boston trades Ramirez. Minnesota has come out of nowhere to lead a division. Detroit's been a flop. Seattle's been a bigger flop (though I thought they were overrated at the beginning of the year).

In the NL we have the Cubs doing well, but I'm sure they'll be Bartmanned at some point. Milwaukee, for the first time in what must be twenty years, actually seems kind of interesting.

Any picks for for ROY, Cy Young, MVPs? What'll you think will happen going down the stretch? I open the floor to you.......
__________________

Zephyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 05:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
 
Tungsten's Avatar
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Gender: Male
Age: 33
Posts: 1,152



Default Re: baseball 2008

The Jays definitely have good pitching but it's kind of a problem when your leading HR threat is Matt Stairs. In retrospect they probably should have just kept Glaus and Thomas
I'd love to see the Rays win the east but the team that's surprised me the most is the Twins. I didn't expect them to still be in it this late, but now that they've had the sense to dump Livan for Liriano I think they can be taken seriously. Especially since their main competition is a team that thinks Ken Griffey Jr. can still play centerfield!
Tungsten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 08:01 AM   #18 (permalink)
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 42
Posts: 4,842



Default Re: baseball 2008

I lost interest in this season the moment the Indians lost their Number 2 and 3 starters and their 3 and 4 hitters to injuries and then gave up and traded away their Number 1 starter (Sabathia) and their 5th or 6th hitter (Blake).

Brian
brimontz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 03:26 PM   #19 (permalink)
 
Status: gone
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,599



Default Re: baseball 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tungsten
The Jays definitely have good pitching but it's kind of a problem when your leading HR threat is Matt Stairs. In retrospect they probably should have just kept Glaus and Thomas
Glaus wanted out because the field turf here exacerbated his foot problem. LaRussa didn't like Rolen in St. Louis so it just became a one-for-one challenge trade. It was all contingent on the condition of Rolen's shoulder: as most people know he had been a terrific hitter as well as an astonishing fielder for years, but has had three separate surgeries on his shoulder in as many years. Two of the last three seasons he hasn't hit well at all either, ostensibly because of that. He started out well here but really hit tough times in July and now he's missed several games lately because, you guessed it, the shoulder's acting up. He's still a GG calibre fielder but it's too bad that he might never be the hitter he was. He was better than Glaus at his peak. Frank Thomas got off to his typical horrible start, wouldn't accept a demotion in the order, so the Jays cut him. There's a feeling that it also had to do with avoiding an incentive clause, whereby he would have made several million more dollars had he reached a certain number of plate appearances. As it was Oakland picked him up, he started hitting well, then injured himself on a double and just came back recently. Who knows how that would have played out. The Jays lineup is in a weird place...no obvious horrible holes, but no studs either. It's a whole lot of meh. It's a tough thing to fix.

Quote:
I'd love to see the Rays win the east but the team that's surprised me the most is the Twins. I didn't expect them to still be in it this late, but now that they've had the sense to dump Livan for Liriano I think they can be taken seriously. Especially since their main competition is a team that thinks Ken Griffey Jr. can still play centerfield!
One thing that's really helped Minnesota is their situational hitting, which has simply been through the roof. They're hitting 278/335/411 overall, but 316/387/467 with RISP. As anyone who's studied the issue will tell you, having that much of a difference between RISP and overall numbers is bound to be luck (of the good variety, in this case). Twins blogger extraordinaire Aaron Gleeman has a good piece on it here:

http://www.aarongleeman.com/2008_07_...g_archive.html
Just scroll down to the July 7 entry. Of course, (finally) dumping Livan Hernandez for Liriano is going to help.
__________________

Zephyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 05:06 PM   #20 (permalink)
 
Tungsten's Avatar
 
Status: SAS Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Gender: Male
Age: 33
Posts: 1,152



Default Re: baseball 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr
One thing that's really helped Minnesota is their situational hitting, which has simply been through the roof. They're hitting 278/335/411 overall, but 316/387/467 with RISP. As anyone who's studied the issue will tell you, having that much of a difference between RISP and overall numbers is bound to be luck (of the good variety, in this case). Twins blogger extraordinaire Aaron Gleeman has a good piece on it here:

http://www.aarongleeman.com/2008_07_...g_archive.html
Just scroll down to the July 7 entry. Of course, (finally) dumping Livan Hernandez for Liriano is going to help.
That's interesting about the Twins, I didn't know that they were hitting so well with RISP. I was looking over their lineup and thought it was strange that they were 5th in the league in runs scored considering that their lineup, other than C and 1B, is pretty bad.
One interesting thing I found was that their team ERA is 3.29 at home and 5.65 on the road. Any clue on why this is? I thought the Metrodome was supposed to be a hitters park. At least it used to be.
Anyway, their pythag record is still 60-54, so they're still a decent team, even if they've been a bit lucky so far. Now that Livan is gone and they've started to bench Lamb I think they're probably an 88-90 win team, which could be enough.
Tungsten is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any baseball fans here? ikey78 Sports Beat 3 03-09-2009 12:04 AM
Baseball player with SA. shyguy246 Triumphs Over Social Anxiety 11 01-31-2009 05:05 PM
Went to a baseball game by myself jtb3485 Triumphs Over Social Anxiety 3 07-07-2007 07:15 PM
baseball Jasmine32 Sports Beat 22 03-27-2007 06:56 PM
baseball = boring vincentgallo4president Sports Beat 14 10-27-2006 03:40 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:53 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.